Message-ID: <17302921.1075855695897.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 02:58:00 -0800 (PST)
From: phillip.allen@enron.com
To: jacquestc@aol.com
Subject: Re: Purchase and Sale Agreement
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Phillip K Allen
X-To: JacquesTC@aol.com @ ENRON
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Phillip_Allen_June2001\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: Allen-P
X-FileName: pallen.nsf

Jacques,

The agreement looks fine.   My only comment is that George and Larry might 
object to the language that "the bank that was requested to finance the 
construction of the project declined to make the loan based on the high costs 
of the construction of the Project".   Technically, that bank lowered the 
loan amount based on lower estimates of rents which altered the amount of 
equity that would be required. 

Did I loan them $1,300,000?  I thought it was less.

Regarding Exhibit A, the assets include:  the land, architectural plans, 
engineering completed, appraisal, and soils study.   Most of these items are 
in a state of partial completion by the consultants.  I have been speaking 
directly to the architect, engineer, and soils engineer.   I am unclear on 
what is the best way to proceed with these consultants.  

The obligations should include the fees owed to the consultants above.  Do we 
need to list balances due or just list the work completed as an asset  and 
give consideration of $5,875 for the cash paid to the engineer and appraisor.

Phillip