Message-ID: <814244.1075857657302.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 04:28:00 -0800 (PST) From: john.arnold@enron.com To: slafontaine@globalp.com Subject: Re: h/j Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: John Arnold X-To: slafontaine@globalp.com @ ENRON X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \John_Arnold_Jun2001\Notes Folders\'sent mail X-Origin: Arnold-J X-FileName: Jarnold.nsf agree guys are short h/j. hard to see a big move with cash/futures trading flat. agree that it has some squeeze potential though. Started moving today as, simultaneously, march started running up and j aron won a big customer deal. customer, maybe a hedge fund, bot 1000+ jv 450 puts. weather frustrating me too. a little long but it's in the backs so I haven't been hurt. Sure would be nice to get some more weather and have this thing start going crazy again. Seen liquids processing come back on at these levels. Would guess more than 50% has from peak. Industrial demand different story. industrial economy just so weak that many petchems and others are burning less because of their markets, not fuel costs. Chrystler is a prime example. Any switching back to gas from industrial or switching back to domestic production from overseas muted by weak economy. slafontaine@globalp.com on 01/31/2001 10:46:50 AM To: jarnold@enron.com cc: Subject: h/j ive been short side just reversed in case weather-plus i think everyone and his brother short h/j agree? mite take a loss on it but seems low risk next day or two from 45 cts. this weather pissing me off tho. you see much industrial demand and changeover in fuel switching t this feb -mar px level? my sources saying yes. hope all is well. talk soon