Message-ID: <6749341.1075855217188.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 09:43:43 -0800 (PST) From: steve.lafontaine@bankofamerica.com To: jarnold@enron.com Subject: FW: re Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: "Lafontaine, Steve" @ENRON X-To: jarnold@enron.com X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \John_Arnold_Jan2002_1\Arnold, John\Inbox X-Origin: Arnold-J X-FileName: jarnold (Non-Privileged).pst > -----Original Message----- > From: LaFontaine, Steve > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 12:43 PM > To: LaFontaine, Steve > Subject: RE: re > > hey man-in the end good luck to whatever way you decide. youre a good guy > in my book. when i left cargill it was intersting to see who in the > industry would continue to talk to me w/out a big infrastructure backing > me. you were one of them who did. some others did not. i wont forget that. > i think this really would be a good fit for you but cant blame you for > looking at the other option as well. > if you go the other way-the primary advantage as i see it is you can > trade alot of non correlated risks. i can tell you this is huge. trading > oil and natgas has made me much bettr and much more consistent. so if yu > go that way id recommend going somewher you can learn petroleum, metals, > equities, grain etc rather than just feeling limited do to experience by > trading natgas only. make sense? my opinion > anywy-whatever yo do ill be glad to help anyway i can. hope youll be on > the east coast for my sake