Message-ID: <11366198.1075856101204.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 03:31:00 -0800 (PST) From: sally.beck@enron.com To: jeffrey.gossett@enron.com Subject: Re: New Counterparty Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Sally Beck X-To: Jeffrey C Gossett X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Sally_Beck_Jun2001\Notes Folders\'sent mail X-Origin: Beck-S X-FileName: sbeck.nsf Thanks for looking into this and getting back to me. Let me know the final resolution on this one. Jeffrey C Gossett 12/13/2000 08:29 AM To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: New Counterparty We have figured out why the credit group is getting so many "New Counterparty" names in gas. The spreadsheets that they are getting that information from are for position purposes only on pipe-optons. The value is captured in TAGG and therefore if both had the correct counterparty it would be doublecounting credit risk. The spreadsheet download has a specific download that it has to follow which includes counterparty name (which in this case had to be put in as new counterparty.) I am working with Debbie to figure out how we can download those positions without showing a counterparty at all from the spreadsheet. It will be done as quickly as possible. Thanks