Message-ID: <26492300.1075855867077.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 12:33:00 -0800 (PST) From: mike.jordan@enron.com To: sally.beck@enron.com, shona.wilson@enron.com Subject: Re: Doorstep meeting Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Mike Jordan X-To: Sally Beck, Shona Wilson X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Sally_Beck_Dec2000\Notes Folders\Doorstep X-Origin: Beck-S X-FileName: sbeck.nsf THis should be considered work in progress as Marcelo is aggresively chasing the people needed to obtain the timelines. Sally, I believe I mentioned the SAP delay to you last Friday and the issues of AS400 prioritisation ( a lot of very significant work logjammed ) but if you need more colour please call me Mike ---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Jordan/LON/ECT on 13/11/2000 20:35 --------------------------- Marcelo Parra@MGUSA 13/11/2000 17:59 To: Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT cc: Andrew Cornfield/LON/ECT@ECT, Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT, , Tim Poullain-Patterson/LON/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Doorstep meeting Mike, Please find attached a status and time line of doorstep issues identified by Shona Wilson and the RAC group. Note that some specific implementation dates have not been provided by responsible parties a of today. I have asked respective responsible parties for specific dates and will update schedule attached as I receive the information. Further note that IT drives many of our critical dates. Since our last meeting we have been advised that any AS 400 system changes will not be considered top priority as the IT team will focus on the off balance sheet financing that must be in place by calendar year end. Also, with the London SAP implementation pushed off until April 2001, the credit aggregation system will not be available until such time. Please let me know if you have nay questions or comments to the attached. Mike Jordan@ECT 11/07/00 07:45 AM To: Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fernley Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT, Marcelo Parra/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Tim Poullain-Patterson/LON/ECT@ECT, Andrew Cornfield/LON/ECT@ECT Subject: Doorstep meeting Shona Thanks for the meeting yesterday - I think the process does improve the transparency and accountability of issues raised. After the call I mentioned to Ted that the meetings might be 'more efficient' if the specific issues identified during doorstep visits - that underpin report comments - were validated by the direct controller on 'point' for the office/business - in this case Marcelo. Ted replied that no harm came from the current approach and to a certain degree I agree that it is good to get an immediate collective response to issues raised !However, I thought we could discuss this for future meetings ( it could be part of the 'how to do a doorstep review' that my guys requested so they are ready to do their individual reviews next year ) -will call later Additionally, I thought I would confirm with you the actions I took down Marcelo and yourself to identify/communciate the specific control concerns identified that were not part of the core tasks transfered Marcelo to add these to existing process efficiencies ( such as systems improvements etc ) and give a full timeline for all 'doorstep' issues Tim to send details of outward bound Commercial instructions and to validate that no specfic exceptions have been recorded to date. Marcelo to validate that no existing business activities conflict systematically with the above instructions All to prepare for full NY review so as to validate compensating controls exist and function in NY Marcelo / Me to identify if any cultural issues are left from recent business communications on roles and responsibilities Myself to ensure that doorstep issues are included within database and monitoring process ( on timelines ) happens Will call later Mike