Message-ID: <10455480.1075863693176.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2000 09:18:00 -0700 (PDT) From: mary.solmonson@enron.com To: hector.mcloughlin@enron.com Subject: Re: Mid-Year PRC Cc: sally.beck@enron.com, sheila.walton@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: sally.beck@enron.com, sheila.walton@enron.com X-From: Mary Solmonson X-To: Hector McLoughlin X-cc: Sally Beck, Sheila Walton X-bcc: X-Folder: \Sally_Beck_Dec2000\Notes Folders\Prc X-Origin: Beck-S X-FileName: sbeck.nsf I haven't checked with all of my Managers, but I know at least some of them sent you their Satisfactory reviews and had not heard anything back from you by 7/31 which I think was the original deadline for completing reviews. And I know that although I received feedback from you on my Needs Improvement employees, I didn't receive any formal feedback on my Satisfactory employees reporting directly to me. I believe I recall a phone conversation that we had where you told me to go ahead and give the Satisfactory reviews. At that point, I told all of my Managers to proceed with completing the reviews on their Satisfactory employees. I believe that all of my department's reviews have been executed and turned in - save one for an Analyst as I am still waiting to hear feedback from his PRC rep. So, based on your explanation of AnneMarie's memo, I guess I would like clarification. Are any of the 51 in my department? Because, it could be that we went ahead and gave them when we were trying to get everything wrapped up in early August and be as timely as possible in giving constructive feedback to our employees based on our phone conversation - and that you're still waiting for us to provide them to you for review. What I mean by it is ridiculous to wait so long to communicate performance feedback is : September? Sorry for any confusion. Don't take things so personally - I'm venting at the process, not the people. Enron North America Corp. From: Hector McLoughlin @ ENRON 09/01/2000 12:33 PM To: Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Sheila Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Mid-Year PRC Ann Marie is our new HR Analyst on rotation with our HR team. The phrase, "We still need to review 51 "Satisfactory" evaluations", was a disclosure to Sally that the 51 evaluations have not been forwarded to HR for review. I did not mean to imply that we were holding any evaluations because we have provided same or next day turn around on the evaluations that I received. As I read the e-mail, I am concerned that you might be under the impression that I have not provided quick turn-around to one or more members of your group. If that is the case and I have not misinterpreted your e-mail, I would like the opportunity to address the issue with your staff so that I can correct the situation. Has a manager told you that I held up an evaluation? I do not have any "satisfactory" evaluations in my possesion that I am reviewing at this time. I wish you had told me of any issues that you perceived were delaying your evaluations because frankly, it was Sally that wanted us to review the satisfactory or below evaluations. Thanks for bringing the matter to my attention. I was not aware that you thought the situation had become ridiculous and I would like to do everything possible to avoid giving you that impression. hgm Mary Solmonson@ECT 09/01/2000 12:04 PM To: Hector McLoughlin/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Mid-Year PRC I don't know who AnneMarie is, but we just went ahead and did our Satisfactory evals. It is ridiculous to wait so long to communicate performance feedback. ---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT on 09/01/2000 12:01 PM --------------------------- AnneMarie Allex@ENRON 08/29/2000 03:16 PM Sent by: AnneMarie Allex@ENRON To: Steve Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, D Todd Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eugenio Perez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron, James Scribner/Corp/Enron@Enron, bob.m.hall@enron.com cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hector McLoughlin/Corp/Enron@Enron Subject: Mid-Year PRC I would like to update you on the progress we have made on Energy Ops mid-year review process. All of the "Needs Improvement" evaluations have been executed except for two which will be executed before the 9/1 deadline. We still need to review 51 "Satisfactory" evaluations. Our target date for this process is September 1st. Please forward your "Satisfactory" evaluations to myself or Hector McLoughlin by September 1st so we can review them and move forward in the process. Thank you for your help. Anne Marie Allex