Message-ID: <15045294.1075855897116.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 05:16:00 -0800 (PST) From: sally.beck@enron.com To: barry.pearce@enron.com Subject: Re: Confirms Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Sally Beck X-To: Barry Pearce X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Sally_Beck_Dec2000\Notes Folders\Sent X-Origin: Beck-S X-FileName: sbeck.nsf Very belated reply - I am cleaning up old e:mails today, and came across this one that I had not answered. Commercial does not sign confirmations at this point. Too many to make that practical these days. When I started the confirm desk in 1994, traders were signing confirms at that time. Once they knew that they had someone who would take responsibility to make sure they were right, they were very glad to pass that responsibility to me. In the early days of power, the traders once again were signing confirms. Obviously interested in the details of every deal that was done. But as the business grew, that too changed. --Sally Barry Pearce @ ENRON COMMUNICATIONS 11/17/2000 07:53 PM To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Confirms Sally/Brent Quick question - your confirms - are they signed by both Commercial & Comm Supp (as Attorney at Fact) - or by just one or the other? I want to make sure EBS is consistent. Currently - one of either Jim F or Paul R are signing all of them - rightly so at the moement - not many deals and they want to see all. Thoughts? B.