Message-ID: <27194404.1075853080446.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 13:39:55 -0700 (PDT) From: penny.mccarran@enron.com To: lynn.blair@enron.com, michele.winckowski@enron.com, stephen.herber@enron.com, dari.dornan@enron.com Subject: RE: NNG - South End Small customer deliveries Cc: mary.darveaux@enron.com, larry.berger@enron.com, michael.bodnar@enron.com, john.buchanan@enron.com, terry.kowalke@enron.com, raetta.zadow@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: mary.darveaux@enron.com, larry.berger@enron.com, michael.bodnar@enron.com, john.buchanan@enron.com, terry.kowalke@enron.com, raetta.zadow@enron.com X-From: McCarran, Penny X-To: Blair, Lynn , Winckowski, Michele , Herber, Stephen , Dornan, Dari X-cc: Darveaux, Mary , Berger, Larry , Bodnar, Michael , Buchanan, John , Kowalke, Terry , Zadow, Raetta X-bcc: X-Folder: \LBLAIR (Non-Privileged)\Blair, Lynn\Inbox X-Origin: Blair-L X-FileName: LBLAIR (Non-Privileged).pst Lynn, Thanks for the additional input from the Gas Logistics experts. I think you are correct that a long term solution will require acceptance of procedural changes by Oneok. I think the Richfield storage idea should be looked at. To my knowledge, there isn't any storage activity at this field but maybe there could be. In the mean time, I am going to propose that we put an OBA in place for the new customer I am trying to satisfy right now. The OBA can be revoked on 48 hours notice if we can come up with a better idea. I have strung this guy along as long as I can. I will let everyone know when we pick this issue up again. Penny -----Original Message----- From: Blair, Lynn Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 10:26 AM To: McCarran, Penny; Winckowski, Michele; Herber, Stephen; Dornan, Dari Cc: Darveaux, Mary; Blair, Lynn; Berger, Larry; Bodnar, Michael; Buchanan, John; Kowalke, Terry; Zadow, Raetta Subject: NNG - South End Small customer deliveries Penny and Michelle, I met with Larry Berger, Terry Kowalke and Raetta Zadow this morning to review yesterday's meeting on the concerns for DDVC's at "small customer delivery points" on the southend of NNG's system. Through our discussions, here are a few ideas including some of yesterday's discussion. These ideas may be somewhat out of the norm, but we thought we would at least throw them on the table. 1. If Oneok cannot supply these deliveries, then Oneok should agree with us to lift the requirement that the supply has to be upstream of the delivery in the Bushton Universe. It can still be required in the "Bushton Universe", just not as restrictive as it is today. 2. If Oneok cannot supply these deliveries, then Oneok should allow us to do storage true ups at 8:00 a.m. at the end of the gas day to eliminate DDVC. 3. If these deliveries are on Firm contracts, can we sell them SMS to cover these small volumes even though they are in the field area? 4. Richfield Storage point - (I am not sure it is even active) - Could we get Oneok to agree to allow true ups if we are supplying the true up with gas coming from the Richfield storage point? I am sure this alternative would need to include the storage group. We would be glad to participate in any future discussions. Thanks. Lynn