Message-ID: <24097078.1075857874305.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 13:31:00 -0800 (PST) From: owner-nyiso_tech_exchange@lists.thebiz.net To: nyiso_tech_exchange@global2000.net Subject: FW: Apparent Schedule Deviations (HQ into ISONE) for Dec 12/00 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: owner-nyiso_tech_exchange@lists.thebiz.net X-To: "'nyiso_tech_exchange@global2000.net'" X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Larry_Campbell_Dec2000\Notes Folders\Notes inbox X-Origin: Campbell-L X-FileName: lcampbel.nsf Posted for info only. > -----Original Message----- > From: Pavo, Mike > Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 9:27 PM > To: ISO-NE Customer Service (E-mail) > Cc: DeVito, Joe > Subject: Apparent Schedule Deviations for Dec 12/00 > > > NRG respectfully requests a written clarification of the events and > consequences of the apparent schedule deviation on Phase I/II for December > 12 HE20 and HE21 . The data shows: > > HE Schedule Actual Flow > Deficiency > 20 1525mw 450 to 850mw 675 to > 1100mw > 21 850mw 450mw > 400mw > > Questions: > 1. Is the data correct? If not what was the error? If yes see below; > 2. Was there an emergency energy sale to HQ for this hour to cover the > deficiency? > 3. What was the impact to energy and ancillary prices? > 4. What was the impact on the NERC performance criteria (CPS1 and CPS2)? > 5. Is the deficiency intended to be resolved thru inadvertent energy > account? > 6. What is the penalty assigned to these ICAP contracts (if any)? > > > Below is the printout of the flow and schedule. > > < I-II Dec 12.htm>> > > Thanks > > Mike Pavo > NRG Power Marketing > > > > - New England - External Flow, Transfer Limits and Schedules for Phase I-II Dec 12.htm