Message-ID: <27724007.1075851912060.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 03:25:00 -0700 (PDT) From: larry.campbell@enron.com To: louis.soldano@enron.com, john.shafer@enron.com, william.kendrick@enron.com, david.roensch@enron.com, rich.jolly@enron.com, randy.rice@enron.com Subject: RE: status, PCB pipeline modeling study Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Larry Campbell X-To: Louis Soldano, John Shafer, William Kendrick, David Roensch, Rich Jolly, Randy Rice X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Larry_Campbell_Nov2001_1\Notes Folders\Pcb modeling study X-Origin: CAMPBELL-L X-FileName: lcampbe.nsf Louie, after the presentation MIchael gave, there were some issues about the data and predictions ie., like how much solvent do we really need to clean the pipeline and the injection intervals and locations, but not whether the solvent or technology would or would not work. The data did show that terpenoline does remove PCB's from pipeline. But because Penn State was so deeply involved in the modeling study, and we were still under the PG&E thumb, it appeared to be in the best interest of TW to see it to the end. There wasnt anyone who had any better suggestions or ideas. The thought was that because of the amount of $$$$$$ we had previously spent, not to see it through would have meant 0 return for the money we had invested. And if it works, the money would have been wisely used. The real truth of course is when we do a trial run. I signed a six month extension to the contract for Penn State (I sent out a memo on this) but not for additional $$$$$$. They needed the extra time to complete the modeling study and data evaluation. Last summer/fall, Tiny had been overseeing the operational side of this (ie terpenoline storage locations and coordinating injection points and the pigging activities). When the decision is made to begin the injections and pigging, Tiny will be ready and waiting...... From: Louis Soldano/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/11/2001 05:31 PM CDT To: Larry Campbell/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: RE: status, PCB pipeline modeling study didn't we kind of shut michael down??? -----Original Message----- From: Campbell, Larry Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 10:44 AM To: Michael@pnge.psu.edu Cc: Shafer, John; Kendrick, William; Jolly, Rich; Rice, Randy; Roensch, David; Soldano, Louis; Terraso, Michael Subject: status, PCB pipeline modeling study Michael, I know its been some time since we communicated, but how is the PCB pipeline modeling efforts going? I would appreciate a summary from you identifying recent discoveries and a general update on the project. Have you thawed out from the Pennsylvania winter?