Message-ID: <32247498.1075851919252.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 05:26:00 -0700 (PDT) From: larry.campbell@enron.com To: michel.nelson@enron.com, john.shafer@enron.com, rich.jolly@enron.com, louis.soldano@enron.com Subject: Additonal PCB Sampling on the SoCal System Cc: butch.russell@enron.com, earl.chanley@enron.com, david.roensch@enron.com, william.kendrick@enron.com, rick.cates@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: butch.russell@enron.com, earl.chanley@enron.com, david.roensch@enron.com, william.kendrick@enron.com, rick.cates@enron.com X-From: Larry Campbell X-To: Michel Nelson, John Shafer, Rich Jolly, Louis Soldano X-cc: Butch Russell, Earl Chanley, David Roensch, William Kendrick, Rick Cates X-bcc: X-Folder: \Larry_Campbell_Nov2001_1\Notes Folders\Sent X-Origin: CAMPBELL-L X-FileName: lcampbe.nsf During the quarterly conference call with SoCal in which we discuss PCB costs on the SoCal system, for which Transwesten is 86% responsible, Ralph Komai, SoCal's PCB person provded some addtional information with respect to what is going on with the PCB activities on the SoCal system. As a result of the PG&E press release, SoCal management directed additional sampling to be done at their interconnect with Transwestern and downstream of this interconnect. Ralph reported that a number of liquid samples came back at around 7 ppm, however one sample at their Kelso Station, near Barstow, came back at 77 ppm. Ralph had indicated that there has been an increase in the PCB's coming into their collection locations in the Needles area as evidenced by the following: Based upon 1997 data, almost no liquids greater than 50 ppm were revcovered Data collected in 1998 showed that approx. 8% of the liquids were greater than 50 ppm Data collected in 1999 showed that approx. 9% of the liquids were greater than 50 ppm Based upon this, Ralph had stated that SoCal would be collecting additional sampling information and possibly entering into an internal montoring program, somewhat like PG&E is currently doing now. I had informed Ralph that our Needles M/S facility had seen almost no liquids in the last 5 years, other than a recent accumulation of a one time pigging in early 2000 when a small volume of liquids (less than 55 gallons) had been collected. We discussed that the accumulations seen on the SoCal system were probably from existing liquids on their system which had collected in low points in their pipeline and were moving downstream due to the increased flows from TW into SoCal. Ralph gave the impression that there were no immediate management tensions resulting from the recent "hits". He just indicated that they would be watching their system and sampling at a more frequent basis.