Message-ID: <18611926.1075853116855.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 10:47:45 -0700 (PDT) From: david.oxley@enron.com To: timothy.callahan@enron.com Subject: RE: Waiver of US Benefits Cc: michelle.cash@enron.com, madeline.fox@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: michelle.cash@enron.com, madeline.fox@enron.com X-From: Oxley, David X-To: Callahan, Timothy X-cc: Cash, Michelle , Fox, Madeline X-bcc: X-Folder: \MCASH (Non-Privileged)\Cash, Michelle\Deleted Items X-Origin: Cash-M X-FileName: MCASH (Non-Privileged).pst So my line to Louise and Mark is? -----Original Message----- From: Callahan, Timothy Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 12:04 PM To: Oxley, David Cc: Cash, Michelle; Fox, Madeline Subject: RE: Waiver of US Benefits I'll get duplicate copies to you for signature. The reason for doing this is more the former than the latter mentioned below. However, there is a concern that other UK nationals remaining on the UK payroll could try to use the US non-discrimination rules to obtain US benefits, if you were provided both. Their success in such a challenge is questionable. Tim -----Original Message----- From: Oxley, David Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 11:27 AM To: Callahan, Timothy Cc: Cash, Michelle; Fox, Madeline Subject: RE: Waiver of US Benefits OK. Much better. Explain to me again why we have to do this? Is it purely to confirm we don't get stuff twice or is there a concern that our participation in both causes a sub-space paradox which may create a time vacuum into which the entire world population may be sucked? David -----Original Message----- From: Callahan, Timothy Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 10:22 AM To: Oxley, David Subject: Waiver of US Benefits David, Let me know if this latest version is acceptable and I'll prepare a waiver for Louise and Mark, as well. Regards, Timothy J. Callahan Director, Global Employee Services Enron Corp 333 Clay Street, Suite 2025 Houston, Texas 77002 Telephone: 713.646.9565 Fax: 713.646.9501