Message-ID: <2738535.1075862051717.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 12:55:01 -0800 (PST) From: fmackin@aol.com To: pam.butler@enron.com, michelle.cash@enron.com, kriste.sullivan@enron.com Subject: Revised Restated Plan Docucments; 1 of 2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: FMackin@aol.com@ENRON X-To: Butler, Pam , Cash, Michelle , Sullivan, Kriste X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \MCASH (Non-Privileged)\Cash, Michelle\Inbox X-Origin: Cash-M X-FileName: MCASH (Non-Privileged).pst Attached is one of the plan documents that has been revised in the following manner: The beginning of Section 3.2 was revised to include a "subject to" provision. Section 3.4 was separated into two parts. Part A is the original provision. Part B is a new provision. Using this revised design, every laid off employee, whether subject to WARN, would receive the same net amount of severance benefit, whether a WARN penalty had to be paid by the employer, whether a WARN notice was given in advance of layoff, or whether WARN did not apply to the lay off in any way. I've received a thumbs up from Michelle for the revisions, which are marked in the attached document to facilitate your review. Pat The second plan document will be sent as an attachment to a separate email. [New Years Resolution: Learn how to unzip bundled files.] - SPP 01 Rstmt doc6 Nov18c1.DOC