Message-ID: <1482474.1075853126410.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 15:22:21 -0700 (PDT) From: michelle.cash@enron.com To: rogers.herndon@enron.com, kim.melodick@enron.com Subject: RE: Chuck Decker Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Cash, Michelle X-To: Herndon, Rogers , Melodick, Kim X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \MCASH (Non-Privileged)\Cash, Michelle\Sent Items X-Origin: Cash-M X-FileName: MCASH (Non-Privileged).pst FYI -- He tried to call me today, but missed me. I have returned his call and left a voice mail for him. I'll let you know if we have a chance to visit. Michelle -----Original Message----- From: Herndon, Rogers Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 1:33 PM To: Melodick, Kim Cc: Cash, Michelle Subject: Chuck Decker Kim/Michelle - Chuck will be contacting you on the non-solicitation language. I asked him to coordinate directly as I am in meetings all day and would just hold up the process. Chuck started out y-day indicating that he just could not live with the language and then this am I told him that If he couldn't live with the language I would ask whether or not we could offer them the 1/2 Restructuring package. when he realized that he may be stuck with a package that would yield 1/2 the $$$ he changed his tune. Now he is saying that all he needs is assurance that our intent is not to keep him out of work at a competitor. In fact, he said he REALLY wanted to sign this today. I think all we need to do is explain our intent with the non-solicitation language. I do not feel we should change the language for him but would like to see us come to an agreement. Thanks, Rogers