Message-ID: <4820947.1075858838842.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 15:11:48 -0700 (PDT) From: l..johnson@enron.com To: l..johnson@enron.com Subject: TW MAOP Increase Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Johnson, David L. X-To: Johnson, David L. X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \SCORMAN (Non-Privileged)\Calendar X-Origin: Corman-S X-FileName: SCORMAN (Non-Privileged).pst Phil has asked for a status of this work. John Keller and I and a couple of others will be meeting with Phil on Thursday, May 24 and review the information below. I still think we need a final scrub and discussion of our working group to firm up the numbers and flesh out the recommendations. However, Phil may have some comments or questions that we also need to address. Therefore, I propose we meet on Friday, May 25 at 1:00 pm to review our position and develop responses to any questions Phil may have had the previous day. I'd like to flange this up with a final description of scenarios and recommendations by the latter part of next week. Steve Harris & Shelley Corman - this is fyi. All others - please try to attend or coordinate your attendance so that your function is represented. -----Original Message----- From: Johnson, David L. Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 6:36 PM To: Asante, Ben; Max Brown (E-mail); Will Burks (E-mail); Chanley, Earl; Michael Crump (E-mail); Frazier, Perry; Gottsponer, Morgan; Hyatt, Kevin; January, Steven; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Peter Stark (E-mail) Cc: Harris, Steven; Corman, Shelley; Johnson, David L.; Keller, John Subject: TW - SJ Lateral MAOP Increase Importance: High I have tried to summarize where I think we are at this time. Is anything else needed to move ahead in developing a recommendation for Phil? If so, please let the rest of the group know immediately. If not, can we tune up the estimates and run the other numbers by early next week? I'll be back in the office Thursday. Thanks! Dave SAN JUAN LATERAL Capacity increase does not require increased takeaway capacity in CA as there is no mainline increase - we substitute San Juan gas for Permian gas Has a relatively high probability of being accepted by OPS (my estimate - 90%) MAOP Increases - 1250 (75% SMYS) from Bloomfield to Bisti 1330 (80% SMYS) from Bisti to Gallup Advantica study, report and presentation - some portion of the $250,000 total (est. $75,000) Minor, if any, additional inspection & testing Compression additions Either 4,000 hp at Bloomfield for 55 MMcf/d - $10 million Or 10,000 hp at Bisti for 90 MMcf/d - $15 million TOTAL (Bisti scenario) 90 MMcf/d $15.1 million ($168,000/MMcf/d) MAIN LINE Capacity increase does require increased takeaway capacity in CA Has a more moderate probability of being accepted by OPS (my estimate - 60%) MAOP Increase - 1100 (79% SMYS) from Station 5 to Needles Advantica study, report and presentation - balance of the $250,000 Inspection, including smart pigging, testing, material evaluation, valve replacement and High Consequence Area pipe replacement - $33 million Station 1 to Needles launcher and receiver $ 1 million Compression additions Red Rock 150 MMcf/d $93 million (works without the MAOP upgrade) 10,000 hp each at Stations 1-4 250 MMcf/d $60 million (requires the MAOP upgrade) Total 400 MMcf/d $153 million TOTAL (Red Rock + 1-4) 400 MMcf/d $185 million ($463,000/MMcf/d) TOTAL (Red Rock only) 150 MMcf/d $127 million ($847,000/MMcf/d) TOTAL (1-4 only) 250 MMcf/d $ 94 million ($376,000/MMcf/d) These summarize the system optimization studies. We would like Ben, Morgan, Perry Frazier, Earl Chanley and Kevin Hyatt to critically evaluate these scenarios, determine the economics, and provide the team and Phil with an overall feasibility evaluation. If favorable, we can release Advantica to begin work and we can brief OPS on the overall plan and direction.