Message-ID: <16680568.1075861067243.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 10:59:14 -0800 (PST) From: oncall.tms@enron.com To: john.buchanan@enron.com, lynn.blair@enron.com, jean.blair@enron.com, shelley.corman@enron.com, steve.january@enron.com, terry.kowalke@enron.com, gerry.medeles@enron.com, sheila.nacey@enron.com, oncall.tms@enron.com Subject: RE: NNG WKEND NOTES - JANUARY 12&13, 2002 Cc: nancy.callans@enron.com, scott.hibbard@enron.com, robert.benningfield@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: nancy.callans@enron.com, scott.hibbard@enron.com, robert.benningfield@enron.com X-From: TMS OnCall X-To: Buchanan, John , Blair, Lynn , Blair, Jean , Corman, Shelley , January, Steve , Kowalke, Terry , Medeles, Gerry , Nacey, Sheila , TMS OnCall X-cc: Callans, Nancy , Hibbard, Scott , Benningfield, Robert X-bcc: X-Folder: \Shelley_Corman_Mar2002\Corman, Shelley\Deleted Items X-Origin: Corman-S X-FileName: scorman (Non-Privileged).pst Here is some information on the paths in question. Robert's Info: Contract 106252 lowered their Intraday 2 volume to 5,922 mmbtu.(EPSQ) The EPSQ on Transwestern is 5,921. The actual EPSQ volume is 5921.5. TW rounded the volume sown and NNG rounded the volume up. Contract 106525 was manually scheduled down by 1 mmbtu for the Final 8:00 AM Cycle TMS actions (1) When you inspect the contract 106252 (NNG), you notice that the EPSQ is 5922 on both receipt and delivery because their is no fuel. (2) When you inspect the contract 27606 (TW), the EPSQ is 6000 for receipt and 5922 for delivery. That is calculating each side seperately. (3) When the volume was entered for 27606, I assumed they entered the receipt side volume of 6000 (EPSQ caclualted from above). The fuel is then calculated from that and the delivery side is populated. The fuel rate is .0131 which calculates the fuel volume of 78.6 (rounded up to 79) which in turn calculates the delivery volume to be 5921. Jill -----Original Message----- From: Buchanan, John Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 6:39 AM To: Blair, Lynn; Blair, Jean; Corman, Shelley; January, Steve; Kowalke, Terry; Medeles, Gerry; Nacey, Sheila; TMS OnCall Cc: Callans, Nancy; Hibbard, Scott; Benningfield, Robert Subject: RE: NNG WKEND NOTES - JANUARY 12&13, 2002 I have started the process to find out why TW and NNG's EPSQ rounds differently. JWB -----Original Message----- From: Blair, Lynn Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 6:34 AM To: Blair, Jean; Buchanan, John; Corman, Shelley; January, Steve; Kowalke, Terry; Medeles, Gerry; Nacey, Sheila; TMS OnCall Cc: Callans, Nancy; Hibbard, Scott; Benningfield, Robert Subject: RE: NNG WKEND NOTES - JANUARY 12&13, 2002 John and Terry, could we look into TW and NNG rounding in the same direction for EPSQ? It seems like that would be more effective. Thanks. Lynn -----Original Message----- From: Blair, Jean Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 9:48 PM To: Blair, Lynn; Buchanan, John; Corman, Shelley; January, Steve; Kowalke, Terry; Medeles, Gerry; Nacey, Sheila; TMS OnCall Cc: Callans, Nancy; Hibbard, Scott; Blair, Jean; Benningfield, Robert Subject: NNG WKEND NOTES - JANUARY 12&13, 2002 Ladies & Gentlemen: Attached is NNG's Weekend Notes for January 12th & 13th. << File: NNGWKednotes_2002.xls >> Best regards, Jean L. Blair Evening Wkend Team (North Team)