Message-ID: <24752616.1075858847389.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 08:34:48 -0700 (PDT) From: shelley.corman@enron.com To: pamela.daily@enron.com Subject: Gas Logistics Location Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Corman, Shelley X-To: Daily, Pamela X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \SCORMAN (Non-Privileged)\Sent Items X-Origin: Corman-S X-FileName: SCORMAN (Non-Privileged).pst Pam, Thanks for all your help on the move/relocation. I think you, Donna Scott & Jean McFarland have made the process of moving very efficient for all involved. On the longer range issue; however, I need to elevate my level of concern that the moves are having on customer service issues. Since Tropical Storm Allison, ETS has experienced one computer system outage after another; including the virus problem the week before last. This morning our scheduling system is out and we are having Internet problems -- both of which are impacting customer nominations. During system outages it is imperative that gas logistics be able to mobilize and implement back-up plans to ensure customer transactions. This is best handled by having a central staging area. I realize these system reliablity problems have nothing to do with our moves or with the ultimate location of the Gas Logistics group. Certainly I am pursuing these reliability concerns with Steve Hotte. But, in light of these issues, I would like to talk about the timing & end state of where Gas Logistics is to be located and how long it is going to take to make this happen. I know that your first priority of late has been to get us off 41. Now that that has happened, I'd like to talk about the timing for which floor remodeling comes next (39, 42, etc) and the ramifications for my group.