Message-ID: <22275012.1075858848302.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 14:02:23 -0700 (PDT) From: shelley.corman@enron.com To: bradley.holmes@enron.com Subject: RE: DRAFT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Corman, Shelley X-To: Holmes, Bradley X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \SCORMAN (Non-Privileged)\Sent Items X-Origin: Corman-S X-FileName: SCORMAN (Non-Privileged).pst Letter looks good. Just a few thoughts: - In addition to the categories of feedback and promise to work on these areas, should we provide a list of specific things that we have done? - Should we attach the first round of FAQ that matches questions from the meeting? Instead of referring to the ETS directors - lets put Lynn, Steve and your phone numbers in the letter? -----Original Message----- From: Holmes, Bradley Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:56 PM To: Corman, Shelley Subject: DRAFT << File: winterops_followup.doc >> Here is a new draft. Edit at will... Brad