Message-ID: <20991221.1075843076785.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2000 06:44:00 -0700 (PDT) From: sandra.mccubbin@enron.com To: jeff.dasovich@enron.com Subject: Re: Possible Messages on Legislation in California Cc: steven.kean@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com, rob.bradley@enron.com, mpalmer@enron.com, karen.denne@enron.com, mona.petrochko@enron.com, susan.mara@enron.com, paul.kaufman@enron.com, samuel.wehn@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: steven.kean@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com, rob.bradley@enron.com, mpalmer@enron.com, karen.denne@enron.com, mona.petrochko@enron.com, susan.mara@enron.com, paul.kaufman@enron.com, samuel.wehn@enron.com X-From: Sandra McCubbin X-To: Jeff Dasovich X-cc: Steven J Kean, Richard Shapiro, James D Steffes, Rob Bradley, mpalmer@enron.com, Karen Denne, Mona L Petrochko, Susan J Mara, Paul Kaufman, Samuel Wehn X-bcc: X-Folder: \Jeff_Dasovich_Dec2000\Notes Folders\California crisis X-Origin: DASOVICH-J X-FileName: jdasovic.nsf since the siting legislation created only a program that is voluntary and not in place of the existing laws, and we have a committment from the legislature, the CEC and the govenor's office to take another shot in January, as they know that this legislation is flawed, too many conflicting interests trying to solve a complex problem in too short a time, I feel this is too harsh...we have already started the process of creating new legislation, that will be as close to a consensus as possible for next session..this legislation did not hurt us, and, some companies feel that they can use the processes. We have to keep in mind that with the knowledge that there will be major reorganization legislation next year, we don't want to offend the friends that we have in Sacramento, particularly the Republicans who were the ones who insisted on an expedited siting bill