Message-ID: <19918994.1075843078378.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 06:53:00 -0800 (PST) From: kathleen.magruder@enron.com To: jeff.dasovich@enron.com, ricardo.charvel@enron.com Subject: Cross-border conf call Cc: aleck.dadson@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: aleck.dadson@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com X-From: Kathleen E Magruder X-To: Jeff Dasovich, Ricardo Charvel X-cc: Aleck Dadson, Richard Shapiro X-bcc: X-Folder: \Jeff_Dasovich_Dec2000\Notes Folders\Cross border task force X-Origin: DASOVICH-J X-FileName: jdasovic.nsf A quick download on our conference call: We agreed to split the larger group up into 3 working groups. The 3 of us are in the southern group. (I, for one, would be happy if all future meetings were held in Mexico City or San Francisco.) By Feb 29, we are to circulate to the larger group a report on existing commercial problems along the US/Mexico border, e. g. continuing difficulties with El Paso Electric and moving power across the border, and recommendations for their solution. Those recommendations could be much farther reaching than just a complaint action against the utility. It is my impression that there could be significant opportunities if we could move more power south across the border, but that there is real intransigence on the part of the utilities on this side. I have no idea what the situation is on the other side of the border. Why don't we trade emails and voicemails over the next few weeks and try to schedule a conference call the week of Feb 14? That will give us about 2 weeks to get a written report together and to follow up on our brilliant discussions. If you have a better idea, let me know.