Message-ID: <33093827.1075843078495.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 06:49:00 -0700 (PDT) From: rob.cone@enron.com To: geoff.pollard@enron.com, richard.crevelt@enron.com, dirk.vanulden@enron.com, jeff.dasovich@enron.com, andrew.wu@enron.com Subject: FW: Detailed Study due date Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Rob Cone X-To: Geoff Pollard, Richard Crevelt, Dirk vanUlden, Jeff Dasovich, Andrew Wu X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Jeff_Dasovich_Dec2000\Notes Folders\Csu fresno X-Origin: DASOVICH-J X-FileName: jdasovic.nsf FYI -----Original Message----- From: "Fantz, Donald" @ENRON@EES Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2000 10:38 AM To: "'Dick Smith@FSU'" Cc: "'Rob Cone@Enron'" ; "Hagen, John H" ; "Kinert, Robert" Subject: Detailed Study due date Dick, In my Feb. 8, 2000 letter to Rob Cone and copy to you, I wrote the following: "PG&E is ready to proceed with the project on the basis of the results presented in the Detailed Study as delivered to Enron Energy Services (EES) and California State University, Fresno (CSUF) on Jan. 12, 2000, pending acceptance, contact execution and payment. Please keep in mind that the contract quality numbers in the Detailed Study are good for 60 days upon delivery of the study. That date is March 12, 2000. This binding cost is based on the assumptions stated in this report. If the project design, scope, or assumptions are changed, or if service has not been contracted for within 60 days, this study and related costs are subject to review and revision. Such additional review may require an additional project deposit." We've passed the March 12, 2000 date. PG&E has graciously extended the March 12, 2000 date to April 28, 2000. > <<...OLE_Obj...>> Don Fantz P.E. Senior Major Account Rep. Co. 821-5528 PTT (559) 263-5528 Cell/Pgr (559) 930-5247 FAX (559) 263-5543 or 5583 Email: dif1@pge.com website: www.pge.com