Message-ID: <3381375.1075861489828.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 10:23:32 -0800 (PST) From: bkc7@pge.com To: jeff.dasovich@enron.com Subject: RE: Natural Gas Strategy Comprehensive Settlement Alternate Decision of Commissioner Wood Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Cherry, Brian X-To: Dasovich, Jeff X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \JDASOVIC (Non-Privileged)\Dasovich, Jeff\Deleted Items X-Origin: Dasovich-J X-FileName: JDASOVIC (Non-Privileged).pst Nope. Loretta is straddling the fence. Duque and Bilas are opposed. Brown hasn't a real clue. Davis isn't sure. Sempra doesn't care because the MOU is more important. SoCalGas can't lobby. Might just get voted out.... -----Original Message----- From: Dasovich, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 10:18 AM To: Cherry, Brian Subject: RE: Natural Gas Strategy Comprehensive Settlement Alternate Decision of Commissioner Wood You're kidding. -----Original Message----- From: Cherry, Brian [mailto:BKC7@pge.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 12:11 PM To: Dasovich, Jeff Subject: RE: Natural Gas Strategy Comprehensive Settlement Alternate Decision of Commissioner Wood Probably. I'll find out later this week. -----Original Message----- From: Dasovich, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 9:06 AM To: Cherry, Brian Subject: RE: Natural Gas Strategy Comprehensive Settlement Alternate Decision of Commissioner Wood Thanks? Brown going to vote for it? -----Original Message----- From: Cherry, Brian [mailto:BKC7@pge.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 10:32 AM To: Dasovich Jeff (E-mail) Subject: FW: Natural Gas Strategy Comprehensive Settlement Alternate Decision of Commissioner Wood > -----Original Message----- > From: Cherry, Brian > Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 8:29 AM > To: Anderson, David W (Law) > Subject: FW: Natural Gas Strategy Comprehensive Settlement Alternate > Decision of Commissioner Wood > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Cherry, Brian > Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 8:28 AM > To: Andrew Niven (E-mail); Benjamin Campbell (E-mail); Dan McLafferty > (E-mail); Dan Thomas (E-mail); David Anderson (E-mail); Dede Hapner > (E-mail); Dennis Gee (E-mail); Donald Petersen (E-mail); Frank Lindh > (E-mail); G Jefferson (E-mail); Gary Guerrero (E-mail); Geoffrey Bellenger > (E-mail); George Clavier (E-mail); J Reidenbach (E-mail); Jerry Miller > (E-mail); John Armato (E-mail); John Clarke (E-mail); Joshua Bar-Lev > (E-mail); Karen Tomcala (E-mail); Kevin Ernst (E-mail); Kirk Johnson > (E-mail); Les Buchner (E-mail); Les Guliasi (E-mail); Linda Agerter > (E-mail); Lisa Lieu (E-mail); Lise Jordan (E-mail); Mark Huffman (E-mail); > Michael Katz (E-mail); Neha Patel (E-mail); Patrick Golden (E-mail); Paul > Sivley (E-mail); Randall Litteneker (E-mail); Ray Williams (E-mail); > Richard Hall (E-mail); Rodney Boschee (E-mail); Sandra Burns (E-mail); > Sandy Dickinson (E-mail); Shaun Halverson (E-mail); Shelly Malekos > (E-mail); Shirley Woo (E-mail); Stuart Tartaglia (E-mail); Todd Arnett > (E-mail); Trista Berkovitz (E-mail) > Subject: Natural Gas Strategy Comprehensive Settlement Alternate > Decision of Commissioner Wood > > Last evening, Commissioner Wood released his alternate to Commissioner > Bilas' Revised Proposed Decision in the Natural Gas Strategy case. > Commissioner Wood's alternate rejects the Comprehensive Settlement > Agreement, which would unbundled SoCalGas' intrastate transmission system, > and approves the Interim Settlement proposal, which would make minor > changes to SoCalGas' windowing procedures, establish hector Road as an > alternate receipt point, and establish pools for gas trading, among other > minor changes. However, Commissioner Wood's alternate goes further, > rejecting the unbundling of core interstate transportation from rates and > eliminating completely the core's contribution to ITCS (interstate > transportation cost surcharges), which cost the core approximately $7-10 > Million per year. > > I'll forward a copy of the alternate to you as soon as it is available. ********************************************************************** This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you. **********************************************************************