Message-ID: <22381.1075852561986.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 18:43:26 -0700 (PDT) From: mday@gmssr.com To: 'amirault@enron.com, paulamirault@aec.ca, jdasovic@enron.com, 'michael.alexander@enron.com, alexanms@sce.com, 'phil.davies@enron.com, phildavies@aec.ca, 'porter@enron.com, porterdk@sce.com Subject: I. 99-07-003 Draft Comments on the Revised Proposed Decision Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: MDay X-To: 'Amirault, Paul' , 'Jeff Dasovich Enron SF' , 'Michael Alexander, SCE' , 'Phil Davies, WGSI Calgary' , 'Porter, Douglas K' X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \JDASOVIC (Non-Privileged)\Deleted Items X-Origin: Shankman-J X-FileName: JSHANKM (Non-Privileged).pst <> Enclosed for your review are the draft comments on the Revised Proposed Decision in the Gas Restructuring Investigation. WGSI and Enron have indicated a desire to file supportive comments. Edison has indicated an interest in reviewing our draft for the purpose of considering joining in our comments. Please send edited electronic versions with underline and strikeout to MBD at this address no later than noon tomorrow. These comments must be filed tomorrow before 5 pm. I am sorry for the lateness of the draft, but these are not extensive comments. Except for the little bombshell about extending commission jurisdiction over gas marketers, I see little in the RPD to warrant our opposition. Even if the Commission proceeds with the jurisdictional grab, I believe it can be overturned by the Court of Appeals. I look forward to your comments. Mike Day