Message-ID: <2841041.1075843082301.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 09:20:00 -0800 (PST)
From: james.steffes@enron.com
To: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
Subject: Re:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: James D Steffes
X-To: Jeff Dasovich
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Jeff_Dasovich_Dec2000\Notes Folders\Eci
X-Origin: DASOVICH-J
X-FileName: jdasovic.nsf

Jeff --

thanks for the call today.  I agree with your perspective on CLEC status / 
implications for EBS.

What we need to think about doing (as we discussed on the phone) is to come 
up with a regulatory risk assessment of becoming a CLEC in CA --

id key risks
assess value at risk (quantitative and qualitative)
develop mitigation plans (incld working to end the need to be a CLEC), and 
assign people to manage the plans.

Happy to help as much as possible.  We should try and have this and then 
discuss with broader EBS WG.

Thanks.

JDS






Jeff Dasovich on 01/24/2000 04:08:28 PM
To: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
cc:  
Subject: Re:  

you mean you've looked through the contract and still couldn't find them?  

p.s. "jeffrina" is a very "21st century" name for little baby girls.  just 
read about it in vogue magazine.