Message-ID: <23292448.1075843083934.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 2 Nov 1999 23:15:00 -0800 (PST) From: robert.frank@enron.com To: jeff.dasovich@enron.com Subject: Re: Edwards AFB Commodity Procurement Requirements Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Robert Frank X-To: Jeff Dasovich X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Jeff_Dasovich_Dec2000\Notes Folders\Edwards air force X-Origin: DASOVICH-J X-FileName: jdasovic.nsf ---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Frank/HOU/EES on 11/03/99 07:15 AM --------------------------- Robert Frank 11/03/99 07:13 AM To: William Gang/HOU/EES@EES cc: Subject: Re: Edwards AFB Commodity Procurement Requirements I think it looks fine - there is one thing I'd consider adding. I'm still thinking it through but it would go something like this: "The title to any electricity purchased on behalf of the Government shall pass from EFSI to the Government at the at the interconnection of facilities owned by the Utility and those owned and operated by the contractor." William Gang 11/02/99 03:43 PM To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Robert Frank/HOU/EES@EES cc: Subject: Edwards AFB Commodity Procurement Requirements Mike, attached are the parameters that we would prefer to see in an RFP for the electrical commodity in California. This approach in any RFP would help us get the best bid possible for a solicitation. I understand from our converstaion of last week that Edwards is contemplating adding the electrical commodity to the RFP that is intended to be used for privatization of the Edwards electrical distribution system. Given this, we have put our jurisdictional discussions with the CPUC on hold pending your resolution of the content of the RFP. We cannot request any dispositive action from the commission on jurisdiction until we can accurately characterize the elements of the transaction. Please advise us, as early as possible whether or not the commodity will be included, and if so, how its inclusion will be structured. Jeff/Bob, please comment on the content of the attachment, too.