Message-ID: <3908451.1075851640748.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 14:11:36 -0700 (PDT) From: j..noske@enron.com To: jeff.dasovich@enron.com Subject: RE: Reliant Protective Order Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Noske, Linda J. X-To: Dasovich, Jeff X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Dasovich, Jeff (Non-Privileged)\Dasovich, Jeff\Inbox X-Origin: DASOVICH-J X-FileName: Dasovich, Jeff (Non-Privileged).pst You're welcome........per my voice mail, sorry for delay. It's been a Monday, I think Richard Sanders was talking away from the phone, it was hard to hear what he was saying. Linda -----Original Message----- From: Dasovich, Jeff Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:49 PM To: Noske, Linda J. Subject: RE: Reliant Protective Order Thank you. -----Original Message----- From: Noske, Linda J. Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:37 PM To: Dasovich, Jeff Subject: Reliant Protective Order Draft of transcribed message from Richard Sanders voice mail (Legal) to Rick Shapiro. Rick forwarded to Jim Steffes. FYI: "We have not seen the Reliant Protective Order. It's only been described to me by their General Counsel. And in the way it was described it was a document that we would probably agree to, because there's still some corks(? and provisions over disagreements about the Confidentiality. So, I'm gonna try to get Mike Kirby to get ahold of it this a.m. in terms of the theme to the Legislators. The question I've got is why haven't we even been offered that same deal? It shows clearly that they're trying to isolate us, and that they're treating us differently from everyone else., but I'm not sure how far that goes....."