Message-ID: <25900977.1075861502989.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 08:51:44 -0800 (PST) From: susan.j.mara@enron.com To: mday@gmssr.com, douglass@energyattorney.com, smara@enron.com, jdasovic@enron.com Subject: RE: AReM response to Wood ACR Cc: jbennett@gmssr.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: jbennett@gmssr.com X-From: "Mara, Susan" @ENRON X-To: MDay , Dan Douglass , Sue Mara at Enron SF , Jeff Dasovich Enron SF X-cc: JBennett X-bcc: X-Folder: \JDASOVIC (Non-Privileged)\Dasovich, Jeff\Inbox X-Origin: Dasovich-J X-FileName: JDASOVIC (Non-Privileged).pst Here's the 2nd draft from yesterday with my comments. Dan is working on the final now. -----Original Message----- From: MDay [mailto:MDay@GMSSR.com] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 6:00 PM To: 'Dan Douglass'; 'Sue Mara at Enron SF'; 'Jeff Dasovich Enron SF' Cc: JBennett Subject: AReM response to Wood ACR Dan, is it possible to see the AReM response to the Wood ACR before it is filed tomorrow? I am going to be preparing the written prehearing conference statement for Enron to be submitted to Barnett at the nov. 7 PHC and I want to make sure we are being consistent in our approach. Thank you. Mike Day - 11-2-01 Joint Comments - Draft 2-sue.doc