Message-ID: <21147002.1075861512281.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 17:14:43 -0800 (PST) From: mflorio@turn.org To: jeff.dasovich@enron.com Subject: Re: Utilities Recommend that "Community Aggregation" Be Suspended as of Sept. 20th Cc: lga@mother.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: lga@mother.com X-From: Mike Florio X-To: Dasovich, Jeff X-cc: 'Lenny Goldberg' X-bcc: X-Folder: \JDASOVIC (Non-Privileged)\Dasovich, Jeff\Inbox X-Origin: Dasovich-J X-FileName: JDASOVIC (Non-Privileged).pst I couldn't open your attachment, but I suspect it's in my mailbox somewhere anyway. We did support the Migden bill on community aggregation, ABX2 9, but the governor vetoed it. I'm not sure where that leaves the program, but I'll see what the forces of darkness have to say. At 01:08 PM 11/19/2001 -0600, Dasovich, Jeff wrote: >I thought you folks were involved in this program and supported it, but >I may have it all wrong. In any case, please see attached regarding >utilities joint proposal on implementing the DA suspension. Community >Aggregation would not be allowed after Sept 20th. Is anything you care >about and/or have a position on? Thanks very much. Hope you're well. > >Best, >Jeff > > > > >********************************************************************** >This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate >and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of >the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by >others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or >authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or >reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and >delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) >are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or >evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of >its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not >be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or >otherwise. Thank you. >**********************************************************************