Message-ID: <29268942.1075851625253.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 16:47:22 -0700 (PDT) From: jeff.dasovich@enron.com To: ek@a-klaw.com Subject: RE: Final Filing of App for Rehearing Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Dasovich, Jeff X-To: 'Evelyn Kahl' X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Dasovich, Jeff (Non-Privileged)\Dasovich, Jeff\Sent Items X-Origin: DASOVICH-J X-FileName: Dasovich, Jeff (Non-Privileged).pst Hi Evie: Two quick things: 1) My understanding is that the PUC has denied the applications for rehearing. There's a group that is fixing to take it to the court of appeals level--can't see any downside ( a) argument is that the PUC erred in its decisionmaking--no record, no facts, no evidence, etc., and that it needs to go back to the drawing board and get the process right before it suspends anything--and b) the heavy-lifting was already done getting the app. for rehrng prepared). Seems like getting a chance to re-argue at the PUC has alot of positives. Were you planning on doing anything? 2) I want to talk to Michael Alcantar about some interesting QF ideas, but wanted to check with you first. Frankly, I'm ignorant as to whether that still occupies a big spot on his plate, if he represents the same folks, etc., and thought I'd check with you first. Hope (all things considered) you're doing well. Best, Jeff