Message-ID: <33083760.1075851629144.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 08:48:57 -0700 (PDT) From: jeff.dasovich@enron.com To: lorraine.lindberg@enron.com Subject: RE: Socalgas Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Dasovich, Jeff X-To: Lindberg, Lorraine X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Dasovich, Jeff (Non-Privileged)\Dasovich, Jeff\Sent Items X-Origin: DASOVICH-J X-FileName: Dasovich, Jeff (Non-Privileged).pst You know what is more recently? Reason I ask is that in the past, when volumes have been low, SoCal's had to "prop up" flows, i.e., keep a minimum at Blythe for "operational reasons" to serve San Diego (they said). So (just to give them the benefit of the doubt), I was wondering if there might be something to that recently. Pure speculation, but wondering if you had any info. Because I certainly can't think of ANY other reason for their behavior. I'm calling another PUC staffer today to discuss. In the meantime, are we continuing to make the request to SoCal for service? Might be a good idea to keep doing that. Best, Jeff -----Original Message----- From: Lindberg, Lorraine Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 8:31 AM To: Dasovich, Jeff Subject: RE: Socalgas Hi Jeff - Throughput to Blythe has been averaging about 84% this year with peak flows of 99% in Jan and March. In your sentence below, do you mean to ensure max vols through Blythe? Typically, Topock averages higher throughput than Blythe. Thanks for your help. Lorraine -----Original Message----- From: Dasovich, Jeff Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 6:02 PM To: Lindberg, Lorraine Subject: Socalgas Talked to someone at the PUC (and I'll be talking to additional folks over there). Question: Do we know what volumes through Blythe have been? One thing that might be happening is that SoCal's restricting flows at Topock in order to ensure minimum volumes through Blythe. Best, Jeff