Message-ID: <2225985.1075851632323.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 20:59:00 -0700 (PDT) From: jeff.dasovich@enron.com To: dhunter@s-k-w.com Subject: Re: URGENT! Technical Working Group Cc: brbarkovich@earthlink.net, cohnap@sce.com, drothrock@cmta.com, fieldejr@sce.com, isenberg@hmot.com, jdasovic@enron.com, kmccrea@sablaw.com, mikahl@ka-pow.com, schoongl@sce.com, vjw@cleanpower.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: brbarkovich@earthlink.net, cohnap@sce.com, drothrock@cmta.com, fieldejr@sce.com, isenberg@hmot.com, jdasovic@enron.com, kmccrea@sablaw.com, mikahl@ka-pow.com, schoongl@sce.com, vjw@cleanpower.org X-From: Jeff Dasovich X-To: dhunter@s-k-w.com X-cc: Barbara Barkovich (E-mail) , Ann Cohn (E-mail) , Dorothy Rothrock (E-mail) , John Fielder (E-mail) , Phil Isenberg (E-mail) , Jeff Dasovich (E-mail) , Keith McCrea (E-mail) , Mike Kahl (E-mail) , Gary Schoonyan (E-mail) , John White (E-mail) X-bcc: X-Folder: \Dasovich, Jeff (Non-Privileged)\Dasovich, Jeff\Sent Items X-Origin: DASOVICH-J X-FileName: Dasovich, Jeff (Non-Privileged).pst See you on Sunday with language on Direct Access. Best, Jeff "Delaney Hunter" 07/06/2001 02:52 PM Please respond to dhunter To: "Mike Kahl (E-mail)" , "Barbara Barkovich (E-mail)" , "John White (E-mail)" , "Ann Cohn (E-mail)" , "John Fielder (E-mail)" , "Gary Schoonyan (E-mail)" , "Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)" , "Dorothy Rothrock (E-mail)" , "Keith McCrea (E-mail)" cc: "Phil Isenberg (E-mail)" Subject: URGENT! Technical Working Group Folks- Ok, here is the plan. We need to draft language on the following issues (including all the options under each of the issues) that were included in our Roadmap Document: Direct Access Large Customer Utility Service options Rate Relief Customer Specific Generation Renewable Energy These are the pieces that are NOT covered in other plans, documents, etc. We need to have the language completed no later than Monday 7/9 at 5:00pm. I am open to suggestions on how best to handle the work -- maybe assigning the topics above to folks and then getting together to refine and finalize a work product? If everyone thinks this is a plan that can work and if there is a specific topic you would like to tackle please let me know. I would propose meeting on Sunday at say 3:00 at Mike Kahl's office if that meets with everyone's approval. Thanks, Delaney