Message-ID: <10249317.1075857365493.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 09:17:00 -0700 (PDT) From: david.portz@enron.com To: melissa.murphy@enron.com Subject: Revised TC language if EPMI is Buyer in ERCOT across DC tie Cc: doug.gilbert-smith@enron.com, clint.dean@enron.com, elizabeth.sager@enron.com, sharen.cason@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: doug.gilbert-smith@enron.com, clint.dean@enron.com, elizabeth.sager@enron.com, sharen.cason@enron.com X-From: David Portz X-To: Melissa Ann Murphy X-cc: Doug Gilbert-Smith, Clint Dean, Elizabeth Sager, Sharen Cason X-bcc: X-Folder: \Clint_Dean_Jun2001\Notes Folders\Discussion threads X-Origin: Dean-C X-FileName: cdean.nsf __________________ I have discussed with Doug Gilbert-Smith the transmission contingent language e-mailed to you on 4-27-01 and am communicating the revised text below for insertion into those written confirmations of EPMI's purchases in ERCOT being supplied across a DC tie, when designated by the ERCOT traders to require this insert . This text is only for those specific transactions which the ERCOT traders indicate. "Transmission Contingent: DC Tie. If Seller is unable to secure the transmission required for this Transaction on a DC tie line across the ERCOT system border ("DC tie"), or transmission on such DC tie is curtailed in a manner affecting Seller's delivery hereunder, then Seller at its election shall not be required to deliver the affected portion of the Energy and, in the event of that election by Seller, neither party shall be liable to the other hereunder for failure to deliver/receive such Energy. No other transmission contingency is designated by the parties to pertain to this Transaction."