Message-ID: <7844384.1075854436836.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 02:47:00 -0700 (PDT) From: david.delainey@enron.com To: kevin.presto@enron.com, elizabeth.sager@enron.com Subject: Re: TVA Issued RFP for peaking power Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: David W Delainey X-To: Kevin M Presto, Elizabeth Sager X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \David_Delainey_Dec2000\Notes Folders\All documents X-Origin: Delainey-D X-FileName: ddelain.nsf Attorney-Client Protected Kevin, If we respond to the RFP with what we believe to be market prices and values and they don't accept it - does that not support a case where damages from the MOPA , for that 500 MW, can be defined to be equal to or lower than our submission. Regards Delainey ---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 08/31/2000 09:31 AM --------------------------- Enron North America Corp. From: Kevin M Presto 08/31/2000 09:08 AM To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: TVA Issued RFP for peaking power Attorney-Client Protected No, I don't think so. TVA wants a two year PPA with 100% control, including AGC and hourly dispatch. We would have to price the capacity and energy product they are asking for extremely high, and we run the risk of increasing our LD exposure in the pending litigation. If Elizabeth thinks we can use the RFP to help our legal case, I would certainly support a response that helps our overall ecomomic position.