Message-ID: <4194438.1075854443465.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 11:16:00 -0700 (PDT) From: david.delainey@enron.com To: benjamin.rogers@enron.com Subject: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: David W Delainey X-To: Benjamin Rogers X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \David_Delainey_Dec2000\Notes Folders\All documents X-Origin: Delainey-D X-FileName: ddelain.nsf Ben, don't do anything at this point. It is not needed. Regards Delainey ---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 06/09/2000 06:16 PM --------------------------- Benjamin Rogers 06/09/2000 09:33 AM To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Dave: I talked with the legal guys at Cinergy and after further discussions with Mike Cyrus, they felt that since these discussions were at a high level and very early in discussions that a "CA" at this time was not needed. There were two sticking points that I was trying to get them to backdown from: 1) a stand-still agreement and 2) a solicitation agreement. They were not willing to back down from these, thus they concluded with suggesting no "CA". Let me know if this is your thoughts as well. Thanks! Ben