Message-ID: <27846872.1075854457589.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 00:53:00 -0800 (PST) From: david.delainey@enron.com To: dan.leff@enron.com Subject: Goldendale Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: David W Delainey X-To: Dan Leff X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \David_Delainey_Dec2000\Notes Folders\Discussion threads X-Origin: Delainey-D X-FileName: ddelain.nsf Dan, any help would be appreciated - we are very well positioned in the Florida market at this point. Regards Delainey ---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/10/2000 08:52 AM --------------------------- Janet R Dietrich 11/10/2000 08:11 AM To: Dick Westfahl/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT cc: (bcc: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT) Subject: Goldendale Hey Dick, I don't want to beat a dead horse here, but I did want to reiterate out need for the GE 7FA's for our Florida projects. Although I understood from you that Goldendale was effectively done, I understand that you haven't yet gone through the dash process, so therefore a window of opportunity. We are looking to pay up to $40,000,000 for a GE 7FA for Ft. Pierce in addition to a commitment on the combined-cycle EPC contract. Our customer at Ft. Pierce is heavily engaged in finalizing contracts and will be prepared to execute in December. We must be able to commit to them (showing title to the que position) by then. I'd like you to compare your anticipated earnings on the Goldendale deal with earnings from moving this turbine to Florida. The $40 million should give you app. $3 million above cost, as well as incremental profits from the EPC contract. Also, you should know that we feel the Florida market has significant upside potential for Enron from a merchant standpoint and anticipate that our first-mover advantage will result in significant earnings. Please let me know how you think Enron should proceed in comparing the two projects. Thanks Dick.