Message-ID: <23208475.1075854471821.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2000 03:53:00 -0700 (PDT) From: david.delainey@enron.com To: joseph.short@enron.com Subject: Follow-up to Comments in enside Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: David W Delainey X-To: Joseph Short X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \David_Delainey_Dec2000\Notes Folders\Sent X-Origin: Delainey-D X-FileName: ddelain.nsf ---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 08/08/2000 10:51 AM --------------------------- David W Delainey 08/08/2000 10:48 AM To: Joeseph Short@ENRON cc: Subject: Follow-up to Comments in enside Joe, thanks for the message. It has been my experience that people who have had experience in our trading, mid market and structuring groups have a better overall understanding of how Enron (ECT or ENA) looks at value and manages risk. Personally, this is the track I took which included a very solid foundation in accounting, operations, trading, structuring and then ultimately in origination. I hope this helps. Regards Delainey ---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 08/08/2000 10:44 AM --------------------------- Joseph Short@ENRON 08/03/2000 02:59 PM To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Follow-up to Comments in enside Dave- You mentioned in enside that some of the skills needed to succeed at Enron are solid structuring skills as well as a grasp of the the accounting, legal, commercial and credit implications of a deal. What is the best way to obtain these skills? Do you believe it is necessary or worthwhile to work a trading desk to truly understand how ENA functions? Thanks, Joe Short