Message-ID: <23932393.1075853657193.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 09:33:00 -0700 (PDT) From: stacy.dickson@enron.com To: susan.elledge@enron.com Subject: Re: Cargill Energy, a division of Cargill, Incorporated -- MPSF 96058924 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Stacy E Dickson X-To: Susan Elledge X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Stacey_Dickson_Nov2001\Notes Folders\Sent X-Origin: Dickson-S X-FileName: sdickso.nsf Susan, I need to see the contract to figure out what is going on. Do you know which attorney initialed it? I can get a copy from him. Stacy Susan Elledge@ENRON 04/30/2001 03:50 PM To: Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Bridgette Anderson/Corp/Enron@ENRON Subject: Cargill Energy, a division of Cargill, Incorporated -- MPSF 96058924 Hi Stacy, Bridgette Anderson is currently briefing a new Enfolio Master Purchase Sale Firm with Cargill, but it is not an "Enfolio II". It has provisions for collateral and includes an Enron guaranty and limited power of attorney. I know if it said "Enfolio II", it would be okay to use it in EOL, and I believe it is good for EOL, but I want to confirm that with you. Also, what's the difference between the two contracts? Is it just the collateral provisions and guaranty that make it different? I'd attach a copy, but it hasn't been scanned yet. Thanks, Susan