Message-ID: <15578814.1075854163928.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 07:56:00 -0700 (PDT) From: daren.farmer@enron.com To: mary.poorman@enron.com Subject: Re: Suemar Berryman; Gulf Plains Plant for Current Month Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Daren J Farmer X-To: Mary Poorman X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Darren_Farmer_Dec2000\Notes Folders\'sent mail X-Origin: Farmer-D X-FileName: dfarmer.nsf We have adjusted Suemar in Sitara. And will probably adjust it again in a few days. Since we bridge back estimates daily, the production at the Berryman well has been adjusted in the economics. So, this will not have an impact on UA4. D Mary Poorman@ENRON 10/18/2000 08:34 AM To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Suemar Berryman; Gulf Plains Plant for Current Month Daren, As you know, we have experienced some fluctuations at the Berryman well for OCT, which in turn affects our volumes at the Gulf Plains Plant. From a physical standpoint, I think that we are fairly well balanced. My concern is that we are "overproduced" on paper by 76,162 Dth/Mo. I think that we need to bring the nominations up to balance in Sitara at the Berryman well and, a corresponding volume at Meters 708 and 6363, with an offset on Strangers to keep the physical side in line. If my understanding is correct (and if not, please correct me) this should have a positive impact on our current month UA4. Thank you, Mary