Message-ID: <24445781.1075854165951.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 05:45:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: daren.farmer@enron.com
To: lauri.allen@enron.com
Subject: Re: Tejas Invoice - Deal 120987 Meter 6290/905 (Tejas Gas Pipeline)
 Oct 99
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Daren J Farmer
X-To: Lauri A Allen
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Darren_Farmer_Dec2000\Notes Folders\'sent mail
X-Origin: Farmer-D
X-FileName: dfarmer.nsf

No, we have transported on Tejas a few times this year also (on and off).  
Carlos should be able to tell you when.

D




Lauri A Allen
08/17/2000 03:27 PM
To: dfarmer@enron.com
cc: Mary Poorman/NA/Enron@Enron 
Subject: Re: Tejas Invoice - Deal 120987 Meter 6290/905 (Tejas Gas Pipeline) 
Oct 99

Daren- Was 10/99 the only month we transported this Carthage gas on Tejas?
---------------------- Forwarded by Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT on 08/17/2000 03:20 
PM ---------------------------


Mary Poorman@ENRON
08/17/2000 02:55 PM
To: Gregory Steagall/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Fred Boas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kellie Bilski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lauri A 
Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT 
Subject: Re: Tejas Invoice - Deal 120987 Meter 6290/905 (Tejas Gas Pipeline) 
Oct 99  

I phoned Doug Trachta at Tejas regarding this issue.  I appears that 
nominations were made under ENA's agreement 6520 on Tejas Pipeline Company 
from Carthage to Indian Hills.  However, both of these points are actually on 
the Tejas Gas Operating.  ENA doesn't have an agreement to ship on Operating, 
but HPL does.   I think we need to set up an accounting arrangement to 
accomodate this deal, it appears as though ENA would be "piggy-backing" on 
HPL's agreement as they actually own the gas.  It appears as though we need 
to move the volumes from Pipeline to Operating, at the very least.  How have 
other months been handled with respect to this transport?

Please let me know if I may be of any further assistance in resolving this 
deal.  

Mary 

ext. 35251