Message-ID: <5345287.1075854169161.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 09:27:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: daren.farmer@enron.com
To: robert.superty@enron.com
Subject: Unify
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Daren J Farmer
X-To: Robert Superty
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Darren_Farmer_Dec2000\Notes Folders\'sent mail
X-Origin: Farmer-D
X-FileName: dfarmer.nsf

Bob, 

On the Texas desk, the majority of our deals are nominated manually (on Excel 
or preprinted forms), with most of the information pulled from Sitara instead 
of Unify.  So, these noms were not late.  For a couple of 3rd party 
pipelines, we do use Unify.  But we did not have nom changes for 5/4.  Our 
only problem was sending noms to HPL.  Which is sending information to 
yourself, but it still delays the confrimation process for the pipeline.  
This nom was sent about 30 minutes late.  Let me know if you have any 
questions.

Daren
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 05/03/2000 
04:22 PM ---------------------------


Edward Terry
05/03/2000 02:18 PM
To: George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J 
Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patti Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT 
Subject: Unify

Please provide Bob Superty with a list of pipelines whom were late or had 
nomiation issues as a result of this mornings Unify problems.