Message-ID: <4949890.1075853970655.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 06:11:00 -0800 (PST) From: julie.meyers@enron.com To: rita.wynne@enron.com Subject: RETRO ASSIGNMENTS Cc: melissa.graves@enron.com, pat.clynes@enron.com, daren.farmer@enron.com, robert.cotten@enron.com, vance.taylor@enron.com, donald.reinhardt@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: melissa.graves@enron.com, pat.clynes@enron.com, daren.farmer@enron.com, robert.cotten@enron.com, vance.taylor@enron.com, donald.reinhardt@enron.com X-From: Julie Meyers X-To: Rita Wynne X-cc: Melissa Graves, Pat Clynes, Daren J Farmer, Robert Cotten, Vance L Taylor, Donald P Reinhardt X-bcc: X-Folder: \Darren_Farmer_Dec2000\Notes Folders\All documents X-Origin: Farmer-D X-FileName: dfarmer.nsf This is a follow up to the conversation you had with Pat yesterday and to reiterate retro contract assignments. We have decided to go back to the old process of handling contract assignments mid-month. This means that if we receive an assignment from legal after the 10th workday, that assignment will become effective for current month the following month. For example, if I receive a notice from whomever that XYZ has been assigned to ABC on 11/15/00 for an legal effective date of 4/00, I will create a new deal from 4/00 forward. On the new deal the currect month will be zeroed out under the expected volumes. Bob would not start nominating this new deal until 12/00, leaving 4/00 - 11/00 to be moved by volume mangement. If this is not a clear understanding from all parties, please let me know. Rita: If this becomes burdensome on your group, please let me know and we will readdress this issue. Thanks!! Julie