Message-ID: <3819868.1075853970765.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 03:03:00 -0800 (PST) From: pat.clynes@enron.com To: daren.farmer@enron.com, gary.hanks@enron.com Subject: Re: Meter # 6009 - Lundell Ranch C/P - Gato Creek Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Pat Clynes X-To: Daren J Farmer, Gary A Hanks X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Darren_Farmer_Dec2000\Notes Folders\All documents X-Origin: Farmer-D X-FileName: dfarmer.nsf FYI From: Robert Cotten @ ECT 11/17/2000 10:56 AM To: Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Meter # 6009 - Lundell Ranch C/P - Gato Creek Vance, It appears the actual volumes have been significantly higher than nominations at the subject meter the past several months. The following represents activity during the months of June through September: Gas Month Total Nom MMBtu Total Actual MMBtu 06/2000 19,680 116,040 07/2000 19,933 128,755 08/2000 19,530 136,845 09/2000 18,540 159,935 Deal # 135708, Calpine Natural Gas Company, is the only activity at this meter. Should we adjust the nomination to more closely resemble the actual volume? Please advise. Thanks. Bob