Message-ID: <12061568.1075854029184.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2000 00:02:00 -0800 (PST)
From: daren.farmer@enron.com
To: howard.camp@enron.com
Subject: Re: UA4
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Daren J Farmer
X-To: Howard B Camp
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Darren_Farmer_Dec2000\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: Farmer-D
X-FileName: dfarmer.nsf

Howard, 

The Park  and Ride deals should be booked to a transport contract.  Desk to 
desk deals should be on the transport contract also.

D




Howard B Camp
01/27/2000 10:17 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Charlotte Hawkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anita Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B 
Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhonda Robinson/HOU/ECT@ECT 
Subject: UA4

Daren,
Just a quick note to follow up on UA4 issues.

For desk to desk deals, we are keeping the entry on co 89 since there is not 
a Co 16 contract with Co 16 and attaching an ECT transport contract to the 
backscreen.

On Park and ride deals, I am under the impression that the Park and ride deal 
would be booked to an 089 contract and cleared either intra month or in a 
subsequent month.
If this is true, was it done by reversing out or offsetting the previous Co 
89 entry.  I am not sure whether an ECT transport should be attached.  I hope 
you have some insight on this issue.

Let me know
HC