Message-ID: <6289824.1075854031026.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2000 01:54:00 -0800 (PST) From: susan.trevino@enron.com To: howard.camp@enron.com Subject: Re: UA4 Cc: daren.farmer@enron.com, charlotte.hawkins@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: daren.farmer@enron.com, charlotte.hawkins@enron.com X-From: Susan D Trevino X-To: Howard B Camp X-cc: Daren J Farmer, Charlotte Hawkins X-bcc: X-Folder: \Darren_Farmer_Dec2000\Notes Folders\All documents X-Origin: Farmer-D X-FileName: dfarmer.nsf What is the status on this meter? Howard B Camp 01/28/2000 07:17 AM To: Susan D Trevino/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: UA4 Susan, Here is the note that I sent Daren . I never have scheduled a Park and Ride and have no idea on how this should be set up. HC ---------------------- Forwarded by Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT on 01/28/2000 07:16 AM --------------------------- Howard B Camp 01/27/2000 10:17 AM To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Charlotte Hawkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anita Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhonda Robinson/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: UA4 Daren, Just a quick note to follow up on UA4 issues. For desk to desk deals, we are keeping the entry on co 89 since there is not a Co 16 contract with Co 16 and attaching an ECT transport contract to the backscreen. On Park and ride deals, I am under the impression that the Park and ride deal would be booked to an 089 contract and cleared either intra month or in a subsequent month. If this is true, was it done by reversing out or offsetting the previous Co 89 entry. I am not sure whether an ECT transport should be attached. I hope you have some insight on this issue. Let me know HC