Message-ID: <32004365.1075854034264.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 09:06:00 -0800 (PST)
From: daren.farmer@enron.com
To: brenda.herod@enron.com
Subject: Entex Estimates for 12/99
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Daren J Farmer
X-To: Brenda F Herod
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Darren_Farmer_Dec2000\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: Farmer-D
X-FileName: dfarmer.nsf

FYI.  Again, Tom does not have this info yet.  So, please allow Gary and/or 
James to talk with him first.

D
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 01/13/2000 
04:18 PM ---------------------------
   
	Enron North America Corp.
	
	From:  Gary A Hanks                           01/13/2000 10:50 AM
	

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:  
Subject: Entex Estimates for 12/99

Attached are two spreadsheets showing Entex data for Dec. 99.

Jan00_factor shows the difference between the estimates that should have fed 
over to POPs and the actual for all meters in the meter set {2001-2500, 2540, 
3509, 3519, 3530, 3533, 6822, 9544}.  I do not have the actual for Vidor CG 
yet.  I have estimated the volume to be 190.00.

Actuals were 6105.26 Mmcf using the Vidor CG estimate
Estimates were 4870.37 Mmcf. 
Difference of 1237.89 Mmcf.  (About 1,250,000 Mmbtu)



Jan00_scada shows that if we had correct information from the Hempstead CG 
RTU the difference would have been 819.186 Mmcf.



If you have any questions please call.  

Gary