Message-ID: <18061962.1075854039161.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 07:39:00 -0800 (PST) From: mandy.mackinnon@enron.com To: karry.kendall@enron.com, michael.bilberry@enron.com, daren.farmer@enron.com, mary.smith@enron.com Subject: King Ranch Cc: marlene.hilliard@enron.com, stella.morris@enron.com, edward.gottlob@enron.com, fred.boas@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: marlene.hilliard@enron.com, stella.morris@enron.com, edward.gottlob@enron.com, fred.boas@enron.com X-From: Mandy MacKinnon X-To: Karry Kendall, Michael C Bilberry, Daren J Farmer, Mary M Smith X-cc: Marlene Hilliard, Stella L Morris, Edward D Gottlob, Fred Boas X-bcc: X-Folder: \Darren_Farmer_Dec2000\Notes Folders\All documents X-Origin: Farmer-D X-FileName: dfarmer.nsf There are two fields of gas that I am having difficulty with in the Unify System. 1. Cage Ranch - Since there is no processing agreement that accomodates this gas on King Ranch, it is my understanding HPL is selling the liquids and King Ranch is re-delivering to stratton. It is also my understanding that there is a .05 cent fee to deliver this gas. We need a method to accomodate the volume flow on HPL at meter 415 and 9643. This gas will not be reflected on Trans. Usage ticket #123395 and #95394 since it is not being nominated from a processing agreement. We either, need to input a point nom (on HPL or KRGP) at these meters to match the nom at meter 9610, or a deal for Purchase and Sale (if King Ranch is taking title to the gas) needs to be input into Sitara at these meters with the appropriate rate. I have currently input a point nom on KRGP to accomodate this flow, so we can divert some of this gas to the current interstate sales that are being made. 2. Forest Oil - There is a processing agreement that will accomodate flow from the meter (6396) into King Ranch. It is my understanding that this agreement was originally setup until Texaco had their own processing agreement. I need confirmation that the gas from this meter should be nominated on contract # (96006681) and that this agreement should have been reassigned to HPLC. (It is currently still under HPLR). If this gas is not nominated on the above transport agreement, then once again we need to accomodate the flow volume on the HPL pipe with either a point nom or a Sitara Deal at meters 415 and 9643.