Message-ID: <8555501.1075854210594.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 02:37:00 -0800 (PST) From: victor.lamadrid@enron.com To: rita.wynne@enron.com, sherlyn.schumack@enron.com Subject: Re: HPL discrepancy Cc: clem.cernosek@enron.com, jackie.young@enron.com, meredith.mitchell@enron.com, cynthia.franklin@enron.com, daren.farmer@enron.com, beverly.beaty@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: clem.cernosek@enron.com, jackie.young@enron.com, meredith.mitchell@enron.com, cynthia.franklin@enron.com, daren.farmer@enron.com, beverly.beaty@enron.com X-From: Victor Lamadrid X-To: Rita Wynne, Sherlyn Schumack X-cc: Clem Cernosek, Jackie Young, Meredith Mitchell, Cynthia Franklin, Daren J Farmer, Beverly Beaty X-bcc: X-Folder: \Darren_Farmer_Jun2001\Notes Folders\All documents X-Origin: Farmer-D X-FileName: dfarmer.nsf Rita, Please help me with this. I have some questions regarding Enerfin. Why are we re-allocating prior month volumes at Enerfin after we matched your original numbers back in October? Can't this be fixed in the actualization process? The numbers for October between ENA-TETCO and HPL vary a good bit. Are we your only customer at that point and why do we show volumes on days ENA had no transactions with HPL? Can we simply put zero paths in UNIFY and extend our existing deals in Sitara with zero volumes and have you guys actualize these small volumes to handle this? We go round and round at this point changing volumes two, three or more times. Call me if you have questions.. Thanks Victor ---------------------- Forwarded by Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT on 12/14/2000 08:50 AM --------------------------- From: Meredith Mitchell on 12/14/2000 09:28 AM To: Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: HPL discrepancy Victor, The sitara ticket that we were using for the month of October is #421415. TETCO shows that the volumes that HPL was allocated on October 6th and October 19th, were 9 dths and 44 dths, respectively. Those volumes were pulled off of our backhaul contract because there was no nomination in place. This is the same problem that we have had over and over with them. Also, we just found out on Tuesday, that the OBA did not go into effect until December 1, 2000. We were originally told that they were putting the OBA in effect retroactively to November of 1999. In fact, I thought that HPL had made a lot of retroactive changes in the system to adjust for the OBA, do you remember that? HPL told us that Ray Calles at TETCO is the one who decided that the OBA would not be effective until December of 2000. Nobody even informed us of this change, I stumbled upon it when researching a November issue for Alfonso Trabulsi and Brenda Fletcher. In addition to all of this, I received another email, which I will copy below, asking me to go in for the month of October and adjust all of my estimated volumes in Unify to match what HPL shows that we were allocated. I had been going in all month long and matching to their numbers, and we were clean for the deadline at the end of the month. I ran the allocation report from TETCO for the month of October, and some of HPL's numbers were very different from TETCO's, including the two days that I mentioned above. I sent Jackie Young an email back showing her TETCO's numbers and I haven't received a response. I will copy that email below as well, just to catch you up on what's been going on. Jackie Young 12/12/2000 10:01 AM To: Cynthia Franklin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Meredith Mitchell/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sherlyn Schumack/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Estimated Volumes for meter 98-0439 for (10/2000) Cynthia/Meredith: Please find below the estimates for the above referenced meter for 10/2000. Once you're done placing these estimates on TETCO's side, can you please apprise me so that volume mgt. can conclude their business? Thanks -Jackie- 3-9497 DAY VOLUMES 1 39647 2 40040 3 39643 4 39809 5 39702 6 18 dec. (str. gas) 7 8 9 10 11 29162 12 14689 13 40400 14 30599 15 30523 16 30394 17 30369 18 40547 19 88 dec. (str. gas) 20 10126 21 20167 22 20208 23 20502 24 40408 25 45721 26 30978 27 43142 28 9667 29 9536 30 10290 31 From: Meredith Mitchell 12/12/2000 11:37 AM To: Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: October Volumes Hi Jackie, I ran a report from TETCO's system to show the volumes that Enron was allocated for the month of October, and some of the volumes are very different from the volumes that you show. I copied your numbers below and copied TETCO's volumes below that (with the disrepancies in red). I was wondering if you could double check the 3rd, 4th, 11th, 12th, 25th, and 27th to see if you had purchases on those days from a counterparty other than Enron North America at that meter. It looks like maybe the volumes that you show are the total flow at that meter, but I think that only part of the gas was actually allocated to us. I don't mind putting the allocated volumes in path manager, but I'd like to make sure that on the above days, I am only putting in the amount that Enron was allocated. Also, on the 6th and the 19th TETCO shows exactly half of what you show, which I thought was kind of strange. I am going to have to get TETCO's permission to do a retroactive nomination for those two days at the volumes you have requested, before I can put anything in Sitara or Unify. My manager is out of the office and will be back tomorrow, but I would like for him to double check the deal that we will have to create in Sitara for those two days, since we are dealing with a prior month issue. DAY VOLUMES 1 39647 2 40040 3 39643 4 39809 5 39702 6 18 dec. (str. gas) 7 8 9 10 11 29162 12 14689 13 40400 14 30599 15 30523 16 30394 17 30369 18 40547 19 88 dec. (str. gas) 20 10126 21 20167 22 20208 23 20502 24 40408 25 45721 26 30978 27 43142 28 9667 29 9536 30 10290 31 DAY VOLUMES 1 39647 2 40040 3 29732 4 24881 5 39702 6 9 dec. (str. gas) 7 8 9 10 11 19441 12 9793 13 40400 14 30599 15 30523 16 30394 17 30369 18 40547 19 44 dec. (str. gas) 20 10126 21 20167 22 20208 23 20502 24 40408 25 25401 26 30978 27 30099 28 9667 29 9536 30 10290 31