Message-ID: <27424496.1075854247364.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 02:51:00 -0800 (PST) From: megan.parker@enron.com To: daren.farmer@enron.com Subject: Tenaska IV Pricing Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Megan Parker X-To: Daren J Farmer X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Darren_Farmer_Jun2001\Notes Folders\Cleburne plant - "cornhusker" X-Origin: Farmer-D X-FileName: dfarmer.nsf I think we need to remove some of the demand charges that have been set up for Williams and Apache. On Williams deal 384237, the demand charge needs to be removed from Sept. 2000. The demand charge should not have started until October 2000. Because we did not know at the time what was happening with this deal, the demand fee was inadvertently paid to Williams for Sept. and we need to recoup our money. On Apache deal 384247, James thinks we need to remove the demand charge completely. He says it is not a part of the deal and Apache is not billing us for it. We also need to talk about the pricing on both of these deals. Williams and Apache are billing us less than what we have in Sitara. To be able to keep this desk at zero, Jim Pond does not want me to use pay the lesser of for the purchases, so we need to address the price differences. You said you had some contract briefs that supported our prices. Please fax a copy to me at 713-646-8420 and I will compare them to what James has. Just a heads up...We are beginning to work on November 2000, so we will need a demand fee entered (hopefully next week). I will email you the spreadsheet after we have received all of the cash and are ready to pay Tenaska IV. Thanks, Megan