Message-ID: <27767266.1075854247689.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 23:56:00 -0800 (PST) From: bob.hall@enron.com To: david.baumbach@enron.com, kristen.hanson@enron.com Subject: Re: Apache deal 384247 10/00 Cc: megan.parker@enron.com, daren.farmer@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: megan.parker@enron.com, daren.farmer@enron.com X-From: Bob M Hall X-To: David Baumbach, Kristen J Hanson X-cc: Megan Parker, Daren J Farmer X-bcc: X-Folder: \Darren_Farmer_Jun2001\Notes Folders\Cleburne plant - "cornhusker" X-Origin: Farmer-D X-FileName: dfarmer.nsf Please follow are current practice and pay the lower price. thanks bob Enron Capital Management From: David Baumbach @ ECT 11/21/2000 03:55 PM To: Megan Parker/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob M Hall/NA/Enron@Enron Subject: Re: Apache deal 384247 10/00 According to the contract brief I received, the 2.175 is a 1999 price. I believe my pricing is correct. Bob or Darren may be able your questions better. Dave Enron North America Corp. From: Megan Parker @ ENRON 11/21/2000 03:27 PM To: David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Apache deal 384247 10/00 I got an invoice for the gas we bought from Apache for Tenaska IV and they have a different price. For deal 384247, we have a price of 2.285 and a demand fee of 0.457 for 25,000/day. Apache is billing us at 2.175 with no demand charge. Can you verify this price for me and let me know which is correct? Thanks, Megan