Message-ID: <6366085.1075854042769.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 07:57:00 -0800 (PST)
From: megan.parker@enron.com
To: daren.farmer@enron.com
Subject: Re: Tenaska IV
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Megan Parker
X-To: Daren J Farmer
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Darren_Farmer_Dec2000\Notes Folders\Cornhusker
X-Origin: Farmer-D
X-FileName: dfarmer.nsf

Any word yet?  I don't mean to rush you, but Tenaska IV is being very 
persistent.
---------------------- Forwarded by Megan Parker/Corp/Enron on 12/04/2000 
03:55 PM ---------------------------
   
	
	
	From:  Megan Parker                           12/01/2000 02:45 PM
	

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  

Subject: Re: Tenaska  

That sounds great.  Because of the accrual, I cannot draft this today.  I 
will try it on Monday.  What about the demand fee for the payable to Tenaska 
IV.  Do you think that is a good idea?  I explained it to Kris Hanson and she 
agreed that it was the best way to book this payable.  We would need a new 
demand purchase ticket for Tenaska IV on the Cleburne desk in the amount of 
$2,803,586.41 with no volume and no commodity.  This is more than we owe 
Tenaska IV, but I will net it with the Tenaska IV sale and the $0.04 demand 
fee to pay a net amount of $1,551,050.76.  I have attached my spreadsheet 
which details our payment.  We will have to adjust this number once we get 
the actual volumes.  I would like to pay Tenaska IV next week, so please let 
me what you think.



Thanks,
Megan